Cited by 3Biblical Studies and InterpretationArchaeology and Historical StudiesAncient Near East History

The Joint Excavations at Tell es-Sulṭân (Jericho)

Tushingham, A. Douglas·1952·Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3218775

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A report about the 1952 excavations concluded that the latest surviving defenses are Middle Bronze Age and that this system had been preceded by two previous Middle Bronze Age walls.

    “A report about the 1952 excavations had come to similar conclusions, stating that the latest surviving defenses are Middle Bronze Age and that this system had been preceded by two previous Middle Bronze Age walls built prior (Tushingham 1952, pp. 8-10).”

    From The Bronze Age Destruction of Jericho, Archaeology, and the Book of Joshua (2023) · cites this paper as Tushingham 1952

Cited by

Authors
Tushingham, A. D.
Corresponding author
Tushingham, A. Douglas
Venue
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
Published
1952-10
Volume
127
Pages
5-16
ISSN
  • 0003-097X (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8062
OpenAlex
W2335374284
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
48.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
Tell es-Sultan, Jericho, archaeological excavation, ancient city, Levant archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review