The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution of Pteridophyta and Melastomataceae along an edaphic gradient in an Amazonian rain forest
Abstract
Abstract. Pteridophyta and Melastomataceae were studied in an area of non‐flooded (tierra firme) rain forest in Peruvian Amazonia, close to the village of Mishana (River Nanay, in the vicinity of Iquitos City). The general objective of the study was to establish a method for rapidly documenting changes in the floristic composition among and within rain forests in geologically different areas. More specifically, the changes in the plant communities were documented along an edaphic and topographic gradient from clay soil on level ground to quartzitic sand on a hill top. Two 5‐m‐wide, parallel transects were established 50 m apart. A total of 40 species of pteridophytes were found; 18 of these were confined to clayey soil and 11 to sandy soil. The total number of Melastomataceae on the transects was 22, and 14 of these were confined to clayey soil while only two were confined to sandy soil. Further differences in the abundance of many species correlated with drainage conditions and the accumulation of organic matter on the soil surface. Cluster analyses were made using both edaphic and floristic criteria, and in all cases the transects could be divided into distinct sections. Both transects gave rather similar results, and therefore it was concluded that the chosen transect width was sufficient to document the prevalent floristic patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Cited by
Ecological strategies in fern evolution: a neopteridological overview
Page, C. N. (2002) · Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology · doi:10.1016/s0034-6667(01)00127-0 · Cited by 323
Svenning, J.-C. (2001) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02857848 · Cited by 255
Vegetation development in an Amazonian peatland
Roucoux, K. H., Lawson, I. T., Jones, T. D., Baker, T. R., Coronado, E. N. H., Gosling, W. D., & Lähteenoja, O. (2013) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.01.023 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuomisto, H., & Ruokolainen, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Vegetation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-34
- ISSN
- 1100-9233 (ISSN-L)
- 1654-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2006039049
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of Pteridophyta and Melastomataceae along an edaphic gradient in an Amazonian rain forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3235634
- The paper
- Tuomisto, H., & Ruokolainen, K. (1994). Distribution of Pteridophyta and Melastomataceae along an edaphic gradient in an Amazonian rain forest. Journal of Vegetation Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.