Cited by 558Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal

Pausas, Juli G., Austin, Mike P.·2001·Journal of Vegetation Science

Abstract

We review patterns of plant species richness with respect to variables related to resource availability and variables that have direct physiological impact on plant growth or resource availability. This review suggests that there are a variety of patterns of species richness along environmental gradients reported in the literature. However, part of this diversity may be explained by the different types and lengths of gradients studied, and by the limited analysis applied to the data. To advance in understanding species richness patterns along environmental gradients, we emphasise the importance of: (1) using variables that are related to the growth of plants (latitudinal and altitudinal gradients have no direct process impact on plant growth); (2) using multivariate gradients, not single variables; (3) comparing patterns for different life forms; and (4) testing for different shapes in the species richness response (not only linear) and for interaction between variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3236601

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Warmer climates may show greater contrasts between plantations and native forests in vegetation complexity and ecosystem service delivery because they support higher plant diversity.

    “The rationale for considering MAT was that by supporting higher plant diversity (24), warmer climates may show greater contrasts between plantations versus native forests in vegetation complexity, and in turn, in delivery of carbon, soil, and water ecosystem services (25).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pausas, J. G., & Austin, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Mediterranean Center for Environmental Studies (ES)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Pausas, Juli G.
  • Austin, Mike P.
Venue
Journal of Vegetation Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02-24
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
153-166
ISSN
  • 1100-9233 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-1103
OpenAlex
W1995683715
Cited by
558
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 25
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Vegetation Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
plant species richness, environmental gradients, resource availability, latitudinal gradient, elevation gradient, plant life forms, environmental filtering, plant growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review