Scales of aboveground and below‐ground competition in a semi‐arid woodland detected from spatial pattern
Abstract
Semi‐arid woodlands are two‐phase mosaics of canopy and inter‐canopy patches. We hypothesized that both aboveground competition (within canopy patches), and below‐ground competition (between canopy patches), would be important structuring processes in these communities. We investigated the spatial pattern of trees in aPinus edulis‐Juniperus monospermawoodland in New Mexico using Ripley'sK‐function. We found strong aggregation of trees at scales of 2 to 4 m, which indicates the scale of canopy patches. Canopy patches were composed of individuals of both species. Crown centers of both species were always less aggregated than stem centers at scales less than canopy patch size, indicating morphological plasticity of competing crowns. In the smallest size classes of both species, aggregation was most intense, and occurred over a larger range of scales; aggregation decreased with increasing size as is consistent with density‐dependent mortality from intraspecific competition. Within canopy patches, younger trees were associated with older trees of the other species. At scales larger than canopy patches, younger trees showed repulsion from older conspecifics, indicating below‐ground competition. Hence, intraspecific competition was stronger than interspecific competition, probably because the species differ in rooting depth. Woodland dynamics depend on the scale and composition of canopy patches, aggregated seed deposition and facilitation, above‐ and below‐ground competition, and t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Browse is especially sensitive to intraspecific competition, whether due to competition for light, water, or nutrients.
“This suggests that browse is especially sensitive to intraspecific competition, whether due to competition for light, water (particularly during the dry season) or nutrients (Martens et al. 1997).”
From A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects (2026) · cites this paper as Martens et al. 1997
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Martens, S. N., Breshears, D. D., Meyer, C. W., & Barnes, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Martens, Scott N.
- Venue
- Journal of Vegetation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 655-664
- ISSN
- 1100-9233 (ISSN-L)
- 1654-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2072215028
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Vegetation Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Keywords
- aboveground competition, belowground competition, semi-arid forests, Pinus edulis, Juniperus monosperma, spatial patterns, tree aggregation, interspecific competition, intraspecific competition, density-dependent mortality, root depth, facilitation, seed deposition, Ripley's K function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review