The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
Abstract
rhetorical schemata to be discussed in what follows. Finally, schemata are descriptions, not definitions. The ‘bus’ schema contains information that is nor-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/002234336500200104 · Cited by 3,428
Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90003-5 · Cited by 908
Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033773 · Cited by 820
Cited by
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015) · The Handbook of Discourse Analysis · doi:10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 · Cited by 5,485
Self-citationPrinciples of Critical Discourse Analysis
van Dijk, T. A. (1993) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006 · Cited by 5,077
Self-citationAn introduction to latent semantic analysis
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539809545028 · Cited by 4,880
Metadata
- Authors
- Staczek, J. J., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059086756
- Cited by
- 5,395
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 777.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 11200 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
