CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Language, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisBiblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East History

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Ugaritic Vocabulary in Syllabic Transcription

Parker, Simon B., Huehnergard, John·1989·Journal of Biblical Literature
DOI 10.2307/3267301
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3267301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parker, S. B., & Huehnergard, J.
ORCID
Huehnergard, John
Venue
Journal of Biblical Literature
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1989
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
320
ISSN
0021-9231 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/3267301
OpenAlex
W2114117091
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Biblical Literature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
Ugaritic language, Ugaritic vocabulary, cuneiform tablets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review