The Exodus in Biblical Memory
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The namelessness of Pharaohs depicts them as paradigmatic figures, allowing readers to apply the message of Exodus to their own experience.
“the namelessness of Pharaohs depicts them as paradigmatic figures, allowing readers to apply the message of Exodus to their own experience.”
From Killing Pharaohs in Exodus: The Anonymity of the Egyptian Kings, the Deconstruction of Their Individuality, and the Egyptian Practice of Damnatio Memoriae (2023) · cites this paper as Hendel 2001, p. 608
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exodus – pomiędzy historią, mitem i koncepcją teologiczną
Lemański, J. (2015) · The Biblical Annals · doi:10.31743/ba.476 · Cited by 3
Joseph the Infiltrator, Jacob the Conqueror?: Reexamining the Hyksos–Hebrew Correlation
Geobey, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.1353/jbl.2017.0001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hendel, R.
- Corresponding author
- Hendel, Ronald
- Venue
- Journal of Biblical Literature
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 601
- ISSN
- 0021-9231 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W298611876
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biblical Literature (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Exodus, biblical memory, Hebrew Bible, Israelite history, Deuteronomy, numbers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
