Research Methodology in Second-Language Acquisition

Bernhardt, Elizabeth B., Tarone, Elaine E., Gass, Susan M., Cohen, Andrew·1995·The Modern Language Journal

DOI 10.2307/329635

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/329635

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused Instruction
Ellis, R. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x · Cited by 826
Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00043521 · Cited by 520
Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning
Sheen, Y. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x · Cited by 330
Comparing Elicited Imitation and Word Monitoring as Measures of Implicit Knowledge
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12138 · Cited by 139
On the reliability of grammaticality judgement tests in second language acquisition research
Mandell, P. B. (1999) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/026765899667538959 · Cited by 91
Assessing second-language oral proficiency for research: The Spanish elicited imitation task
Bowden, H. W. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000443 · Cited by 90
ELICITED IMITATION TASKS AS A MEASURE OF L2 PROFICIENCY: A META-ANALYSIS
Kostromitina, M., & Plonsky, L. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000395 · Cited by 61
Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference?
Macaro, E., & Masterman, L. (2006) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168806lr197oa · Cited by 54

Authors: Bernhardt, E. B., Tarone, E. E., Gass, S. M., & Cohen, A.
Venue: The Modern Language Journal
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 1995
Volume: 79
Issue: 2
Pages: 272
ISSN: 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/329635
OpenAlex: W4233867811
Cited by: 358
References: 0
FWCI: 194.96
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review