The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plant Diversity of the Cape Region of Southern Africa
Open accessAbstract
Comprising a land area of ca. 90,000 km2, less than one twentieth (5%) the land area of the southern African subcontinent, the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is, for its size, one of the world’s richest areas of plant species diversity. A new synoptic flora for the Region has made possible an accurate reassessment of the flora, which has an estimated 9030 vascular plant species (68.7 % endemic), of which 8920 species are flowering plants (69.5 % endemic). The number of species packed into so small an area is remarkable for the temperate zone and compares favorably with species richness for areas of similar size in the wet tropics. The Cape region consists of a mosaic of sandstone and shale substrata with local areas of limestone. It has a highly dissected, rugged topography, and a diversity of climates with rainfall mostly falling in the winter months and varying from 2000 mm locally to less than 100 mm. Ecological gradients are steep as a result of abrupt differences in soil, altitude, aspect, and precipitation. These factors combine to form an unusually large number of local habitats for plants. Sandstone-derived soils have characteristically low nutrient status, and many plants present on such soils have low seed dispersal capabilities, a factor promoting localized distributions. An unusual family composition includes Iridaceae, Aizoaceae, Ericaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Proteaceae, Restionaceae, Rutaceae, and Orchidaceae among the 10 largest families in the flora, following Asteraceae and Fabaceae, as the most speciose families. Disproportionate radiation has resulted in over 59.2 % species falling in the 10 largest families and
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global State of Biodiversity and Loss
Dirzo, R., & Raven, P. H. (2003) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105532 · Cited by 1,366
Hopper, S. D., & Gioia, P. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130201 · Cited by 831
A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot—the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa
Cowling, R. M., Pressey, R. L., Rouget, M., & Lombard, A. T. (2003) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00425-1 · Cited by 435
Pressey, R. L., Cowling, R. M., & Rouget, M. (2003) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00424-x · Cited by 393
The partitioning of Africa: statistically defined biogeographical regions in sub‐Saharan Africa
Linder, H. P., de Klerk, H. M., Born, J., Burgess, N. D., Fjeldså, J., & Rahbek, C. (2012) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02728.x · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldblatt, P., & Manning, J. C.
- Venue
- Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281
- ISSN
- 0026-6493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2324719405
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Diversity of the Cape Region of Southern Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3298566
- The paper
- Goldblatt, P., & Manning, J. C. (2002). Plant Diversity of the Cape Region of Southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. https://doi.org/10.2307/3298566
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.