Cited by 18Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesAnthropological Studies and InsightsIndigenous Cultures and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fine Mats and Money: Contending Exchange Paradigms in Colonial Samoa

Linnekin, Jocelyn·1991·Anthropological Quarterly

Abstract

The A. examines early Western interpretations of Samoan ceremonial exchange and reviews attempts to regulate and prohibit prestations involving fine mats, an in-kind valuable that was instrumental in Samoan political maneuvering. Colonial suppression was unsuccessful in the long run, but not because of unwritting traditionalism on the part of the Samoans. The ostensible continuity of Samoan ceremonial exchange must be seen as part of a reflective and interactive process whereby Samoans actively participated in the redefinition and reorienting of their own institutions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3317832

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Linnekin, J.
Corresponding author
Linnekin, Jocelyn
Venue
Anthropological Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1991-01
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
0003-5491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015532729
Cited by
18
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthropological Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review