The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Postmodern Theory. Critical Interrogations
Abstract
In this timely volume, the authors systematically analyze postmodern t heory to evaluate its relevance for critical social theory and radical politics today. The authors claim that while postmodern theory provi des insights into contemporary developments, it lacks adequate methodo logical and political perspectives to provide a critical social theory and radical politics for the present age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chapter 3 : Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education
Gee, J. P. (2000) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x025001099 · Cited by 2,727
Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn
Clarke, A. E. (2003) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553 · Cited by 892
Qualitative Research in Sociology
Marvasti, A. (2004) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849209700 · Cited by 573
Mingers, J. (2004) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2003.06.001 · Cited by 462
Lopes, L. L. (1991) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354391011005 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghasarian, C., Best, S., & Kellner, D.
- Venue
- Revue Française de Sociologie
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151
- ISSN
- 0035-2969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091485237
- Cited by
- 911
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 186.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postmodern Theory. Critical Interrogations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3321956
- The paper
- Ghasarian, C., Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1996). Postmodern Theory. Critical Interrogations. Revue Française de Sociologie. https://doi.org/10.2307/3321956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
