The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fiscal, Service, and Political Impacts of Indianapolis-Marion County's Unigov
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, the actual amount of consolidation was small with most services remaining decentralized and a reduction in local governments of only 60 to 50 (Blomquist and Parks, 1995).”
From Regionalization and Consolidation of Municipal Taxes and Services (2018) · cites this paper as Blomquist and Parks, 1995
In the citing paper
“However, suburban property taxes were used only for county services while those in the city saw tax increases because of having to pay not only for city services but also for county services.”
From Regionalization and Consolidation of Municipal Taxes and Services (2018) · cites this paper as Blomquist and Parks, 1995
In the citing paper
“Blomquist and Parks (1995) analyze the highly-touted Indianapolis Unigov city-county consolidation, which was expected to correct inequality by using suburban property taxes to help finance the city services enjoyed by suburbanites.”
From Regionalization and Consolidation of Municipal Taxes and Services (2018) · cites this paper as Blomquist and Parks, 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Regionalization and Consolidation of Municipal Taxes and Services
Hall, J. C., Matti, J., & Zhou, Y. (2018) · Review of Regional Studies · doi:10.52324/001c.8001 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Blomquist, W., & Parks, R. B.
- ORCID
- Blomquist, William
- Venue
- CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
- Publisher
- Crossref
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 37
- ISSN
- 0000-0000
- OpenAlex
- W4233655451
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- municipal mergers, county government, fiscal impact, political influence, local government
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
