The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles of Group Solidarity
Open accessAbstract
Social scientists have long recognized that solidarity is essential for such phenomena as social order, class, and ethnic consciousness, and the provision of collective goods. In presenting a new general theory of group solidarity, Michael Hechter here contends that it is indeed possible to build a theory of solidarity based on the action of rational individuals and in doing so he goes beyond the timeworn disciplinary boundaries separating the various social sciences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of games and economic behavior
(2019) · 100 Years of Math Milestones · doi:10.1090/mbk/121/32 · Cited by 16,632
Williamson, O. E. (1975) · Cited by 6,810
Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought
Williams, G. C. (2008) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · doi:10.1515/9781400820108 · Cited by 2,762
Wallerstein, I. M. (2010) · University of Michigan Library Repository · doi:10.14288/1.0102827 · Cited by 2,505
Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice
Woodward, J. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,031
Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,486
Webb, S. B. P. S., & Webb, B. (1894) · Cited by 240
Vogel, E. F. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674366299 · Cited by 211
Whyte, W. F. (1977) · Cited by 131
Vélez‐Ibáñez, C. G. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 100
Cited by
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action
Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230191 · Cited by 3,493
Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665
Why Strict Churches Are Strong
Iannaccone, L. R. (1994) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230409 · Cited by 1,315
An Affect Theory of Social Exchange
Lawler, E. J. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/324071 · Cited by 1,255
Metadata
- Authors
- Stolzman, J., & Hechter, M.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244
- ISSN
- 0318-6431 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995342547
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 108.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Group Solidarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3341302
- The paper
- Stolzman, J., & Hechter, M. (1989). Principles of Group Solidarity. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
