Cited by 555Political Economy and MarxismMarxism and Critical TheoryEcocriticism and Environmental Literature

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature

Open access
Grundmann, Reiner, Foster, John Bellamy·2001·Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie

Abstract

The materialist conception of nature the really earthly question parsonian naturalism the materialist conception of history the metabolism of natue and society coevolution and sustainability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3341498

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 555

Metadata

Authors
Grundmann, R., & Foster, J. B.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2001
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
670
ISSN
0318-6431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4298026979
Cited by
555
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Canadian Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Keywords
Karl Marx, ecology, materialism, nature, Marxist theory of nature, human-nature relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review