The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reproductive Effects of Alternative Disinfectants
Open accessAbstract
Organohalides formed through the reaction of chlorine and organic compounds in natural and waste waters pose potential health hazards. For this reason, alternative water disinfectants that do not form organohalides are being investigated with great interest. Limited data are available on the health effects, in particular reproductive toxicity effects, of these compounds. In our laboratory, we have examined the reproductive effects of chloramine and chlorine administered by gavage in Long-Evans rats. Animals were treated for a total of 66 to 76 days. Males were treated for 56 days and females for 14 days prior to breeding and throughout the 10-day breeding period. Females were treated throughout gestation and lactation. Following breeding, the males were necropsied and evaluated for sperm parameters and reproductive tract histopathology. Adult females and some pups were necropsied at weaning on postnatal day 21. Other pups were treated postweaning until 28 or 40 days of age. These pups were evaluated for the day of vaginal patency and thyroid hormone levels. No differences were observed between control rats and those rats exposed to up to 5 mg/kg/day chlorine or 10 mg/kg/day chloramine when fertility, viability, litter size, day of eye opening, or day of vaginal patency were evaluated. No alterations in sperm count, sperm direct progressive movement (micron/sec), percent motility, or sperm morphology were observed among adult male rats. In addition, male and female reproductiv…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“No differences were observed between control rats and rats exposed up to 10 mg/kg/day of monochloramine when fertility, viability, litter size, day of eye opening or day of vaginal patency were evaluated.No alterations in sperm count, sperm direct progressive movement, percent motility or sperm morphology were observed among adult males.”
From Inorganic chloramines: a critical review of the toxicological and epidemiological evidence as a basis for occupational exposure limit setting (2020) · cites this paper as Carlton et al. 1986
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wastensson, G., & Eriksson, K. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408444.2020.1744514 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlton, B. D., Barlett, P., Basaran, A., Colling, K., Osis, I., & Smith, M. K.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-11
- Volume
- 69
- Pages
- 237
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1474326
- OpenAlex
- W2095063130
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Keywords
- chloramines, chlorine, reproductive toxicity, organohalides, sperm motility, fertility, pregnancy and lactation, thyroid hormones, vaginal opening, Long-Evans rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chloramines, Chlorine, Disinfectants, Female, Male, Pregnancy, Reproduction, Spermatozoa, Water Supply, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive Effects of Alternative Disinfectants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3430391
- The paper
- Carlton, B. D., Barlett, P., Basaran, A., Colling, K., Osis, I., & Smith, M. K. (1986). Reproductive Effects of Alternative Disinfectants. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.2307/3430391