The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations
Abstract
P adopt proprietary standards.That policy has now changed.The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) also recently considered changing its policy to permit proprietary Web standards, prompting a firestorm of criticism. 8Assertions by IBM and Microsoft of patents that allegedly cover ebXML and SOAP have also caused huge controversy in the Internet standards community. 9It remains to be seen whether the open nature of the Internet will survive this shift to proprietary standards, 10 but in any event the magnitude of the stakes should be clear.Whether interface standards are open or closed depends in large part on the rules standard-setting organizations adopt and how those rules are enforced.Given the importance of SSO rules that govern intellectual property rights, they have received surprisingly little treatment in the legal literature until quite recently. 11In this Article I attempt to fill that void.8
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms
McAdams, R. H. (1997) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1290070 · Cited by 474
Simple Games in a Complex World: A Generative Approach to the Adoption of Norms
Picker, R. C. (1997) · The University of Chicago Law Review · doi:10.2307/1600216 · Cited by 317
Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code's Search for Immanent Business Norms
Bernstein, L. (1996) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · doi:10.2307/3312639 · Cited by 282
Cooter, R. D. (1996) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · doi:10.2307/3312636 · Cited by 225
Structural adjudication and the new law merchant: A model of decentralized law
Cooter, R. D. (1994) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/0144-8188(94)90020-5 · Cited by 162
International Organization for Standardization
Marsden, A., & Shahtout, A. (2024) · doi:10.1002/9781683673941.ch19 · Cited by 119
More Order Without More Law: A Theory of Social Norms and Organizational Cultures
Huang, P. H., & Wu, H.-M. (1994) · The Journal of Law Economics and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036856 · Cited by 112
Social Meaning and Social Norms
Lessig, L. (1996) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · doi:10.2307/3312651 · Cited by 98
Cooter, R. D., & Ellickson, R. C. (1993) · California Law Review · doi:10.2307/3480790 · Cited by 55
Legal Design and the Evolution of Commercial Norms
Kraus, J. S. (1997) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/468001 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms
Simcoe, T. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.305 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemley, M. A.
- Venue
- California Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1889
- ISSN
- 0008-1221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4230133834
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3481437
- The paper
- Lemley, M. A. (2002). Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations. California Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.