Cited by 10Catholicism and Religious StudiesReligion and Society InteractionsReligious and Theological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Religion and the Sociology of Culture: Exploring the Organizational Cultures of Two Midwestern Roman Catholic Dioceses

Harper, Charles L., Schulte-Murray, Rebecca K.·1998·Review of Religious Research

Abstract

Charles L. Harper, Rebecca K. Schulte-Murray, Religion and the Sociology of Culture: Exploring the Organizational Cultures of Two Midwestern Roman Catholic Dioceses, Review of Religious Research, Vol. 40, No. 2 (Dec., 1998), pp. 101-119

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3512297

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harper, C. L., & Schulte-Murray, R. K.
Venue
Review of Religious Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1998-12
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
101
ISSN
0034-673X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334399287
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Religious Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious and Theological Studies
Keywords
organizational culture, Catholic Church, religion and culture, diocesan administration, Midwestern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review