Cited by 85Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial variation of naticid gastropod predation in the Eocene of North America

Abstract

Although, the fossil record of naticid gastropod drilling has played an important role in the controversy over predator-prey evolution, little is known about variation of drilling frequencies within single horizons or how predation patterns are influenced by environmental variables. Without an understanding of spatial variation in drilling, temporal patterns in drilling are difficult to interpret. We surveyed 27,554 specimens of molluscs from the Cook Mountain interval (upper middle Eocene) and Jackson Group (late Eocene) of the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plain to document spatial variation in naticid drilling frequencies. The Jackson Group assemblages from the Moodys Branch and Yazoo formations were sampled along a depth gradient in order to compare drilling frequencies to environmental variables within a single climatic zone. There was a statistically significant difference between drilling frequency of the inner to middle shelf Moodys Branch Formation (mean = 8.3%) and the outer shelf Yazoo Formation (mean = 21.2%; chi square = 49.58, P ≪ 0.001), but there was no significant bathymetric trend in drilling frequencies among the five assemblages of the Moodys Branch. Drilling frequency was not related to substrate type within the Moodys Branch. Drilling, however, was correlated with species diversity of Moodys Branch assemblages (r = 0.50, P < 0.01). Drilling frequency was significantly correlated with the percentage of naticids in each assemblage (r = 0.77, P < 0.001) an…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3515257

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hansen, T. A., & Kelley, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Western Washington University (US)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Venue
PALAIOS
Published
1995-06-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
268-278
ISSN
  • 0883-1351 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5323
OpenAlex
W2318712142
Cited by
85
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palaios (publishedVersion)
  • Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
naticid gastropods, predation, Eocene, spatial variability, depth gradient, shelf environment, species diversity, prey selection, Lucinidae, Corbulidae, Turritellidae, Hipponicidae, Jackson Group, Gulf Coastal Plain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review