The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developments in Research on Black Families: A Decade Review
Abstract
Robert Joseph Taylor, Linda M. Chatters, M. Belinda Tucker, Edith Lewis, Developments in Research on Black Families: A Decade Review, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 52, No. 4, Family Research in the 1980s: The Decade in Review (Nov., 1990), pp. 993-1014
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mcleod, J. D., & Owens, T. J. (2004) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250406700303 · Cited by 184
Comparisons of parenting attitudes among five ethnic groups in the United States
Jambunathan, S., Burts, D. C., & Pierce, S. (2000) · Journal of Comparative Family Studies · doi:10.3138/jcfs.31.4.395 · Cited by 133
Class, Race, and Gender Dimensions of Child Rearing in African American Families
Hill, S. A. (2001) · Journal of Black Studies · doi:10.1177/002193470103100407 · Cited by 95
African-American homeless and low-income housed mothers: Comparison of parenting practices.
Koblinsky, S. A., Morgan, K. M., & Anderson, E. A. (1997) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/h0080209 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, R. J., Chatters, L. M., Tucker, M. B., & Lewis, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Marriage and the Family
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 993
- ISSN
- 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038491842
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
