The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraspecific Variation in Body Size and Fecundity in Insects: A General Relationship
Abstract
The relationship between intra-specific variation in female body size and potential fecundity was investigated using the published literature on 57 oviparous species of Coleoptera, Diptera, Ephemeroptera, Heteroptera, Homoptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Trichoptera, and 11 species of larviparous Aphidina and Diptera. Female body sizes were converted to dry body weight. Variation in body weight and fecundity was expressed as percentage deviation from the median values. The increase in fecundity with body weight was similar in most taxa, with only a few important exceptions. The common regression for oviparous and larviparous species predicts a 0.95% increase in median fecundity for each 1% increase in dry body weight. The number of ovarioles (in 10 species of Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera and Orthoptera) also increased with body weight. The general relationship predicted a 0.81% increase in ovariole number for each 1% increase in dry body weight. The slope of ovariole number versus weight relationship was greater in species with many ovarioles than in species with few. The common slope of the fecundity/size relationship is close to 1 and this indicates that female size is a principal constraint on insect potential fecundity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients
Simpson, S. J., Sibly, R. M., Lee, K. P., Behmer, S. T., & Raubenheimer, D. (2004) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.03.003 · Cited by 532
GOBBI, P., MARTÍNEZ-SÁNCHEZ, A., & ROJO, S. (2013) · European Journal of Entomology · doi:10.14411/eje.2013.061 · Cited by 233
Capacity of mosquitoes to transmit malaria depends on larval environment
Moller-Jacobs, L. L., Murdock, C. C., & Thomas, M. B. (2014) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-014-0593-4 · Cited by 180
Effects of food stress and density in different life stages on reproduction in a butterfly
Bauerfeind, S. S., & Fischer, K. (2005) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13888.x · Cited by 164
Sexual size dimorphism in birds
Székely, T., Lislevand, T., & Figuerola, J. (2007) · Sex, Size and Gender Roles · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0004 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Honěk, A., & Honek, A.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 483
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014997440
- Cited by
- 1,690
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraspecific Variation in Body Size and Fecundity in Insects: A General Relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3544943
- The paper
- Honěk, A., & Honek, A. (1993). Intraspecific Variation in Body Size and Fecundity in Insects: A General Relationship. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544943
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.