Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reproductive Effort in Long-Lived Birds: Age-Specific Patterns of Condition, Reproduction and Survival in the Wandering Albatross

Weimerskirch, Henri·1992·Oikos

Abstract

The condition, breeding performance and survival of the wandering albatross Diomedea exulans were studied in relation to the bird's reproductive experience and age. In both sexes, the body weight of immature birds increased steadily with age from 4 to 7 yr. In individual immature females it increased from one season to the next, and only those attaining a threshold value bred, irrespective of their age. At similar ages immature birds tended to be lighter than breeders. The weight of breeding males increased progressively throughout the breeding life, while that of females increased only during the first 15 yr. In contrast to most species the date of laying for first time breeders was earlier than for experienced birds. Experienced birds tended to lay at similar dates from one breeding season to the other. Birds failing to breed during the previous breeding season tended to lay earlier than successful individuals. The size of the egg and breeding success increased with the age and experience of the female to a maximum at 17-20 yr or 5-7 breeding attempts and then decreased in the older or more experienced birds. For first time breeders the breeding success and rate of return was the same for older individuals as for younger. The proportion of birds breeding one year after a failed breeding season was lower in birds breeding for the first time than in more experienced birds. There was no significant difference between the proportion of inexperienced and experienced birds returning to breed two yr after a successful breeding season. Birds with more than eight yr breeding experience also tended to postpone their return after a failed season longer than less experienced birds. Annual survival rate did not vary significantly with age between 4 and 22 yr. Birds older than 27 yr had a significantly lower survival than birds aged 16-22 yr (92.9% compared to 97.2%). This study suggests that in a very long-lived bird like the wandering albatross survival is not influenced by reproduction, particularly in the early ages because the onset of breeding is delayed until the risk of an increased mortality at first breeding has disappeared. Condition has probably an important influence in the decision to breed. The age related changes in breeding performance, condition and survival observed in the wandering albatross are probably influenced by the cumulative effects of an increase in skill and thereafter reproductive restraint at young ages, by the selection of high quality birds at intermediate ages and by senescence at older ages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3545162

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Weimerskirch, H.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1992-09
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
464
ISSN
0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323010931
Cited by
350
References
0
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive Effort in Long-Lived Birds: Age-Specific Patterns of Condition, Reproduction and Survival in the Wandering Albatross. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3545162
The paper
Weimerskirch, H. (1992). Reproductive Effort in Long-Lived Birds: Age-Specific Patterns of Condition, Reproduction and Survival in the Wandering Albatross. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545162

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.