The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regional Dynamics of Plants: A Review of Evidence for Remnant, Source-Sink and Metapopulations
Abstract
Despite a long tradition in plant ecology of studies of patch dynamics, recent developments of models for large scale dynamics in source-sink and metapopulations have largely focused on animals. In contrast to mobile unitary animals, many plants resist extinction. even under conditions where only a part of the life cycle can be maintained. This model of remnant population dynamics adds to the two commonly recognized source-sink and metapopulations dynamics. A review of the literature suggests that all three types of dynamics are common in plants. Regional dynamics are related to life-cycle characteristics determining dispersal ability and longevity of life cycle stages. Short-lived or highly habitat specialized plants with good dispersal tend to build up metapopulations, i.e. systems of local populations and non-occupied but potentially suitable sites, interconnected with dispersal. and in a continuous flux of local colonization and extinction. At the other extreme, long-lived plants with clonal propagation. or plants with extensive seed banks, tend to build up remnant population systems, in which many local populations persist over periods long enough to bridge unfavourable phases of successional development, intervening periods of favourable conditions. Source-sink populations are a special case of metapopulations, in the sense that they comprise both persistent refuge populations and ephemeral populations maintained by dispersal. It is suggested that a concept of local population inertia in remnant population systems, scales to higher level phenomena of vegetation inertia, and to community stabilization (through enhanced recovery after perturbations). Such an inertia may contribute to explain cases of exceptionally high species diversity, and lack of pronounced mass extinctions of plants in the fossil record.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ELASTICITIES: A REVIEW OF METHODS AND MODEL LIMITATIONS
de Kroon, H., van Groenendael, J., & Ehrlén, J. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0607:earoma]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 632
Longevity of clonal plants: why it matters and how to measure it
de Witte, L. C., & Stöcklin, J. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq191 · Cited by 263
Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants
Öckinger, E., Eriksson, A. K., & Smith, H. G. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.009 · Cited by 261
Metapopulations and metacommunities: Combining spatial and temporal perspectives in plant ecology
Alexander, H. M., Foster, B. L., Ballantyne, F., Collins, C. D., Antonovics, J., & Holt, R. D. (2012) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01917.x · Cited by 124
Patch size effects on plant species decline in an experimentally fragmented landscape
Collins, C. D., Holt, R. D., & Foster, B. L. (2009) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-1405.1 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Eriksson, O.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031916735
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional Dynamics of Plants: A Review of Evidence for Remnant, Source-Sink and Metapopulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3546063
- The paper
- Eriksson, O. (1996). Regional Dynamics of Plants: A Review of Evidence for Remnant, Source-Sink and Metapopulations. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.