The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assembly Rules within a Contingent Ecology
Abstract
Ecologists have searched for general principles, or assembly rules, which determine how species combine to form communities. Two major strands of research highlight the interaction of assembly rules operating at different levels of community organisation. and within uncertain local and historical contingencies. Here, we review the aterature on community assembly within the context of three principal determinants: dispersal constraints, environmental constraints and internal dynamics. This classification separates external factors (dispersal and environmental constraints) from mternal processes (internal dynamics). We assert that assembly rules are general, deterministic and mechanistic, and operate on internal dynamies within the constraints imposed by the local environment and the history of species invasions. Several assembly rules have been proposed to operate within and across trophic levels, as well as on whole systems. The rules act through resource dynamics and spatial dynamies to select species or subsets of species that can coexist, and may lead to patterns of increasing biomass and non-random spatial distributions. Environmental constraints restriet species establishment and mediate interactions among successful colonists; a change in environmental constraints, either exogenous or endogenous. may drive community change. Even in systems at equilibrium, environmental constraints influence the outcome of assembly rules. Dispersal constraints determine the pool of potential colonists available at a particular time and place, and are a complex amalgam of species-specific traits, storage effects, landscape ecology, and history. The order and timing of species invasions (dispersal constraints) interact with assembly rules to produce priority effects. The directionality of community assembly may be lost if either the rate of species invasions or the rate of non-selective species extinctions exceeds the rate at which species are selected by assembly rules. The falling apart, or disassembly, of a community through breakdown of species interactions may follow different rules or a different assembly trajectory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species
Macarthur, R., & Levins, R. (1967) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282505 · Cited by 4,611
Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., & Shachak, M. (1994) · Ecosystem Management · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4018-1_14 · Cited by 4,295
Community structure, population control, and competition.
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., & Slobodkin, L. B. (1960) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282146 · Cited by 3,492
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Hutchinson, G. E. (1961) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282171 · Cited by 3,074
Ecology and Evolution of Communities
Cody, M. L., & Diamond, J. M. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/260204c0 · Cited by 3,065
Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities
Holt, R. D. (1977) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(77)90042-9 · Cited by 2,535
POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF ORGANISMS AS PHYSICAL ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERS
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., & Shachak, M. (1997) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1946:paneoo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,422
Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology
Keddy, P. A. (1992) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3235676 · Cited by 2,193
Cited by
Phylogenies and Community Ecology
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 · Cited by 4,609
Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory
HilleRisLambers, J., Adler, P. B., Harpole, W. S., Levine, J. M., & Mayfield, M. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160411 · Cited by 1,448
A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity
Ricklefs, R. E. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x · Cited by 1,360
SUDING, K. N., LAVOREL, S., CHAPIN, F. S., CORNELISSEN, J. H. C., DÍAZ, S., GARNIER, E., GOLDBERG, D., HOOPER, D. U., JACKSON, S. T., & NAVAS, M. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x · Cited by 1,285
Catford, J. A., Jansson, R., & Nilsson, C. (2009) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x · Cited by 1,154
Metadata
- Authors
- Belyea, L. R., & Lancaster, J.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 402
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027282029
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assembly Rules within a Contingent Ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3546646
- The paper
- Belyea, L. R., & Lancaster, J. (1999). Assembly Rules within a Contingent Ecology. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.