The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of Woody Plant Secondary Metabolism by Resource Availability: Hypothesis Testing by Means of Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Our aim in this study was to determine how well phenotypic variation in foliar concentrations of carbon-based secondary compounds (CBSCs) in woody plants can be predicted on the basis of two resource-based hypotheses, i.e. the carbon-nutrient balance (CNB) and growth-differentiation balance (GDB) hypotheses. We conducted a meta-analysis of literature data with respect to responses of CBSCs, carbohydrates and nitrogen to six types of environmental manipulations (fertilization with nitrogen or phosphorus, shading, CO 2 enrichment, drought stress, ozone exposure). Plant responses to nitrogen fertilization, shading and CO 2 enrichment in terms of pooled CBSCs and carbohydrates were consistent with predictions made with the two hypotheses. However, among biosynthetically distinct groups of CBSCs only concentrations of phenylpropanoid-derived compounds changed as predicted; hydrolyzable tannins and terpenoids, in particular, were less responsive. Phosphorus fertilization did not affect concentrations of CBSC or primary metabolites. Plant responses to drought and ozone exposure presumably were driven by plant demands for particular types of compounds (osmolites in the case of drought and antioxidants in the case of ozone exposure) rather than by changes in resource availability. Based on the relative importance of the treatment effects, we propose a hierarchical model of carbon allocation to CBSCs. The model implies that CBSC production is determined by both resource availability and specific demand-side responses. However, these two mechanisms work at different hierarchical levels. The domain of the CNB and GDB hypotheses is at the high hierarchical levels, predicting the total amount of carbon that can be allocated to CBSCs. Predicting altered concentrations of individual CBSCs, i.e. low hierarchy levels, probably demands biosynthetically detailed models which also take into account the history of plant interactions with biotic and abiotic factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress-Induced Phenylpropanoid Metabolism.
Dixon, R. A., & Paiva, N. L. (1995) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.7.7.1085 · Cited by 4,634
The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend
Herms, D. A., & Mattson, W. J. (1992) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/417659 · Cited by 4,262
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Carbon/Nutrient Balance of Boreal Plants in Relation to Vertebrate Herbivory
Bryant, J. P., Chapin, F. S., & Klein, D. R. (1983) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544308 · Cited by 2,497
Plant Apparency and Chemical Defense
Feeny, P. (1976) · Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2646-5_1 · Cited by 2,344
[36] Flavonoids as antioxidants: Determination of radical-scavenging efficiencies
Bors, W., Heller, W., Michel, C., & Saran, M. (1990) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(90)86128-i · Cited by 1,723
(2006) · Ecohydrology · doi:10.1071/9780643094093.ch02 · Cited by 1,214
Toward a General Theory of Plant Antiherbivore Chemistry
Rhoades, D. F., & Cates, R. G. (1976) · Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2646-5_4 · Cited by 1,181
A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments
Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L. L., Wallace, A., & Walsh, J. S. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285428 · Cited by 865
Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores
Rhoades, D. F. (1979) · Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) · Cited by 860
Cited by
Global response patterns of terrestrial plant species to nitrogen addition
Xia, J., & Wan, S. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02488.x · Cited by 709
FIRE EFFECTS ON NITROGEN POOLS AND DYNAMICS IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS: A META-ANALYSIS
Wan, S., Hui, D., & Luo, Y. (2001) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1349:feonpa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 616
Light Regulation of Plant Defense
Ballaré, C. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040145 · Cited by 560
Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P. S., & Jones, M. H. (2001) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(01)32013-5 · Cited by 421
META-ANALYSIS OF SOURCES OF VARIATION IN FITNESS COSTS OF PLANT ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSES
Koricheva, J. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0176:maosov]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koricheva, J., Larsson, S., Haukioja, E., Keinänen, M., & Keinanen, M.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 212
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2333174397
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 31.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulation of Woody Plant Secondary Metabolism by Resource Availability: Hypothesis Testing by Means of Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3546833
- The paper
- Koricheva, J., Larsson, S., Haukioja, E., Keinänen, M., & Keinanen, M. (1998). Regulation of Woody Plant Secondary Metabolism by Resource Availability: Hypothesis Testing by Means of Meta-Analysis. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.