The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant-Insect Herbivore Interactions in Elevated Atmospheric CO 2 : Quantitative Analyses and Guild Effects
Abstract
Interactions between insect herbivores and plants grown under conditions of ambient and elevated CO 2 were investigated by analysing data on 43 herbivores, representing 61 plant-hcrbivore interactions. Changes in herbivore performance in enhanced CO 2 environments were correlated with changes in the quality of the host plants. measured as nitrogen content. water content, carbohydrate content and secondary plant compounds. The data were analysed to determine whether CO 2 mediated effects on insect performance differed between feeding guilds (leaf-chewers. leaf miners, phloem-feeders (root and shoot), xylem-feeders, whole-cell-feeders and seed-caters) or instar stage. Host-plant quality changed in elevated CO 2 ; leaf nitrogen content decreased, on average. by 15% while carbohydrates increased by 47% and secondary plant compounds (phenolics) by 31%. Water content did not change. Of the variables measured changes in nitrogen and carbohydrate levels only were found to be correlated with changes in food consumption. No differences were found in CO 2 -mediated herbivore responses on woody plant compared with non-woody plants. Insects from different feeding guilds respond to CO 2 mediated changes in host-plant quality in various ways. Leaf-chewer generally seem able to compensate for the decreased nitrogen levels in the plant tissues by increasing their food consumption (by 30%) and with no adverse effects on pupal weights. Leaf-miners only slightly increase their food consumption. The negative effect on pupal weight suggests that their population dynamics may change over several generations. Limited data on seed-eaters suggest that enhanced CO 2 conditions have no effect on these insects. Phloem-feeders and whole-cell-feeders are the only insects to show a positive CO 2 response. Population sizes generally increased in elevated CO 2 and development time of phloem-feeders was reduced by 17%. Early instar larvae are restricted more by CO 2 enhancement than late instars. Although changes in food consumption are similar. changes in development times are much more pronounced in young instars (18% vs 6%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Caulfield, F., & Bunce, J. A. (1994) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1093/ee/23.4.999 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Elevated CO2and plant structure: a review
Pritchard, S. G., Rogers, H. H., Prior, S. A., & Peterson, C. M. (1999) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00268.x · Cited by 462
VILLALPANDO, S. N., WILLIAMS, R. S., & NORBY, R. J. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01721.x · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Bezemer, T. M., & Jones, T. H.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 212
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318590408
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant-Insect Herbivore Interactions in Elevated Atmospheric CO 2 : Quantitative Analyses and Guild Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3546961
- The paper
- Bezemer, T. M., & Jones, T. H. (1998). Plant-Insect Herbivore Interactions in Elevated Atmospheric CO 2 : Quantitative Analyses and Guild Effects. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.