The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community Assembly Rules, Morphological Dispersion, and the Coexistence of Plant Species
Abstract
In order to find and define any assembly rules for communities, we must first investigate the patterns among species assemblages. We used a series of null models to test for patterns in wetland plant composition at the level of species, functional guilds, and traits. At the species level, we found significant checkerboard and nestedness patterns. Three functional guilds had some tendency to contribute a constant percentage to species richness, but after Bonferroni correction there was no significant pattern. Coexisting plant species showed no consistent overall pattern of morphological dispersion. However, when we considered each of 11 traits in turn, we found that 4 traits were overdispersed and 3 were underdispersed. Thus there are morphological assembly rules that constrain wetland plant community composition. These results reconcile contrasting views of community assembly. Communities can be simultaneously structured by a tension between two forces: abiotic external forces that constrain certain traits within limits and biotic internal forces that tend to keep coexisting species from being too similar. Because our sites vary along a fertility/disturbance gradient, we also investigated how trait dispersion varies in space. Trait dispersion increases with soil fertility; soil phosphorus explains about 36% of the variance in mean nearest neighbor distance. Species richness tends to decline with mean nearest neighbor distance, which contrasts with the general pattern for animal assemblages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients
Tilman, D. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937080 · Cited by 1,076
Constraints and Tradeoffs: Toward a Predictive Theory of Competition and Succession
Tilman, D. (1990) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565355 · Cited by 750
Cited by
SUDING, K. N., LAVOREL, S., CHAPIN, F. S., CORNELISSEN, J. H. C., DÍAZ, S., GARNIER, E., GOLDBERG, D., HOOPER, D. U., JACKSON, S. T., & NAVAS, M. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x · Cited by 1,285
Huston, M. A. (1999) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546645 · Cited by 747
Hypervolume concepts in niche‐ and trait‐based ecology
Blonder, B. (2018) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.03187 · Cited by 389
Kahmen, S., Poschlod, P., & Schreiber, K.-F. (2002) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00197-5 · Cited by 317
Limiting similarity, niche filtering and functional diversity in coastal lagoon fish communities
Mouillot, D., Dumay, O., & Tomasini, J. A. (2007) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.08.022 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiher, E., Clarke, G. D. P., & Keddy, P. A.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112916222
- Cited by
- 627
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Assembly Rules, Morphological Dispersion, and the Coexistence of Plant Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3547051
- The paper
- Weiher, E., Clarke, G. D. P., & Keddy, P. A. (1998). Community Assembly Rules, Morphological Dispersion, and the Coexistence of Plant Species. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3547051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.