Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Archaeology of Southern Africa

Bisson, Michael S., Mitchell, Peter·2003·The International Journal of African Historical Studies

Abstract

1. Introduction 2. Frameworks 3. Origins 4. Modern humans, modern behaviour? 5. Living through the late Pleistocene 6. From the Pleistocene into the Holocene: social and ecological models of cultural change 7. Hunting, gathering and intensifying: Holocene foragers in Southern Africa 8. History from the rocks, ethnography from the desert 9. Taking stock: the introduction and impact of pastoralism 10. Early farming communities 11. The Zimbabwe tradition 12. Later farming communities of southernmost Africa 13. The archaeology of colonialism 14. Southern African archaeology today.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3559427

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 507

Metadata

Authors
Bisson, M. S., & Mitchell, P.
Venue
The International Journal of African Historical Studies
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2003
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
503
ISSN
0361-7882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W629872341
Cited by
507
References
0
FWCI
97.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Archaeology of Southern Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3559427
The paper
Bisson, M. S., & Mitchell, P. (2003). The Archaeology of Southern Africa. The International Journal of African Historical Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/3559427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.