The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Competition Hierarchy among Boreal Ants: Impact on Resource Partitioning and Community Structure
Abstract
Differences in social organization and behaviour rank ant species into a competition hierarchy (starting with superior competitors): territorials (e.g., the Formica rufa -group red wood ants), encounterers (e.g. Camponotus, Lasius niger), and submissives (e.g., Formica fusca). Territorials and encounterers behave aggressively against individuals of alien colonies; these species are not expected to cooccur. Submissives behave recessively and may coexist with stronger species, but their forager numbers and nest densities should decrease. If such small-scale behavioural processes structure the ant community, predictable larger-scale nest-distribution pattern of the species is expected. We tested the expectations with bait experiments and nest mapping, and modelled the results by multiway contingency tables. Submissives showed complementary abundances with territorials in terms of forager numbers on the baits, and their nest densities within the territory increased toward its periphery. Pressure by territorial and encounter species on the baits caused the submissive species to shift from protein to carbohydrate. Territorials and encounterers had complementary occurrences on the baits. The nests of territorials were far apart, with only occasional nests of encounter species at the outskirts of the territory. In the late successional habitats of the boreal taiga biome superior territorial competitors, especially the polycalic red wood ant species, assume the role of organizing centers of ant species assemblages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A note on trophic complexity and community stability.
Paine, R. T. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282586 · Cited by 1,796
Cited by
COMPETITIVE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE DISPLACEMENT OF NATIVE ANTS BY THE INVASIVE ARGENTINE ANT
Holway, D. A. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0238:cmutdo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 615
Human, K. G., & Gordon, D. M. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00328744 · Cited by 503
Community disassembly by an invasive species
Sanders, N. J., Gotelli, N. J., Heller, N. E., & Gordon, D. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0437913100 · Cited by 488
Andersen, A. (1997) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.1997.00137.x · Cited by 379
Andersen, A. N. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285419 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Savolainen, R., Vepsäläinen, K., & Vepsalainen, K.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988-02
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983728033
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Competition Hierarchy among Boreal Ants: Impact on Resource Partitioning and Community Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3565636
- The paper
- Savolainen, R., Vepsäläinen, K., & Vepsalainen, K. (1988). A Competition Hierarchy among Boreal Ants: Impact on Resource Partitioning and Community Structure. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565636
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.