Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Competition Hierarchy among Boreal Ants: Impact on Resource Partitioning and Community Structure

Savolainen, Riitta, Vepsäläinen, Kari, Vepsalainen, Kari·1988·Oikos

Abstract

Differences in social organization and behaviour rank ant species into a competition hierarchy (starting with superior competitors): territorials (e.g., the Formica rufa -group red wood ants), encounterers (e.g. Camponotus, Lasius niger), and submissives (e.g., Formica fusca). Territorials and encounterers behave aggressively against individuals of alien colonies; these species are not expected to cooccur. Submissives behave recessively and may coexist with stronger species, but their forager numbers and nest densities should decrease. If such small-scale behavioural processes structure the ant community, predictable larger-scale nest-distribution pattern of the species is expected. We tested the expectations with bait experiments and nest mapping, and modelled the results by multiway contingency tables. Submissives showed complementary abundances with territorials in terms of forager numbers on the baits, and their nest densities within the territory increased toward its periphery. Pressure by territorial and encounter species on the baits caused the submissive species to shift from protein to carbohydrate. Territorials and encounterers had complementary occurrences on the baits. The nests of territorials were far apart, with only occasional nests of encounter species at the outskirts of the territory. In the late successional habitats of the boreal taiga biome superior territorial competitors, especially the polycalic red wood ant species, assume the role of organizing centers of ant species assemblages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3565636

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Savolainen, R., Vepsäläinen, K., & Vepsalainen, K.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
135
ISSN
0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983728033
Cited by
423
References
1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Competition Hierarchy among Boreal Ants: Impact on Resource Partitioning and Community Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3565636
The paper
Savolainen, R., Vepsäläinen, K., & Vepsalainen, K. (1988). A Competition Hierarchy among Boreal Ants: Impact on Resource Partitioning and Community Structure. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565636

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.