The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological Neighborhoods: Scaling Environmental Patterns
Abstract
In this paper we review, develop, and differentiate among concepts associated with environmental patterning (patch, division, and heterogeneity), spatial and temporal scales of ecological processes (ecological neighborhoods), and responses of organisms to environmental patterning (relative patch size, relative patch duration, relative patch isolation, and grain response). We generalize the concept of ecological neighborhoods to represent regions of activity or influence during periods of time appropriate to particular ecological processes. Therefore, there is no single ecological neighborhood for any given organism, but rather a number of neighborhoods, each appropriate to different processes. Neighborhood sizes can be estimated by examining the cumulative distribution of activity or influence of an organism as a function of increasingly large spatial units. The spatial and temporal dimensions of neighborhoods provide the scales necessary for assessing environmental patterning relative to particular ecological processes for a given species. Consistent application of the neighborhood concept will assist in the choice of appropriate study units, comparisons among different studies, and comparisons between empirical studies and theoretical postulates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological and Genetic Consequences of Density-Dependent Regulation in Plants
Antonovics, J., & Levin, D. A. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.002211 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time
Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. R. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159 · Cited by 6,707
Wiens, J. A. (1989) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2389612 · Cited by 3,689
Landscape Ecology: What Is the State of the Science?
Turner, M. G. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614 · Cited by 990
Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876
“Knowing the dispersal ecology of the study organism can guide the optimal spatial scale, resolution, and extent of sampling (Addicott et al. 1987; Wagner and Fortin 2005; Anderson et al. 2010).”
Self-citationIMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES
Tyre, A. J., Tenhumberg, B., Field, S. A., Niejalke, D., Parris, K., & Possingham, H. P. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/02-5078 · Cited by 803
Metadata
- Authors
- Addicott, J. F., Aho, J. M., Antolin, M. F., Padilla, D. K., Richardson, J. S., & Soluk, D. A.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 340
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041072863
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological Neighborhoods: Scaling Environmental Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3565770
- The paper
- Addicott, J. F., Aho, J. M., Antolin, M. F., Padilla, D. K., Richardson, J. S., & Soluk, D. A. (1987). Ecological Neighborhoods: Scaling Environmental Patterns. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.