The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Habitat Occupancy Patterns of North American Shrubsteppe Birds: The Effects of Spatial Scale
Abstract
Understanding the processes that underlie how birds select and use habitats depends on an accurate representation of the patterns of habitat occupancy. These patterns are sensitive to the spatial scale on which they are viewed. Densities of several shrubsteppe bird species in North America varied in relation to features of habitat structure at a biogeographic scale, but these associations disappeared at a regional scale within the shrubsteppe. In another regional comparison involving a different array of shrubsteppe plots and sites, densities of both sage trashers (Oreoscoptes montanus) and sage sparrows (Amphispiza belli) varied with habitat features in quite different ways than in the other regional analysis. A consideration of the pattens of distribution of the bird species in a multivariate habitat space created by Principal Components Analysis of the regional habitat data revealed several clear patterns, but these relationships generally failed to hold when the spatial scale was further reduced, to consider differences between plots at the same location. At this scale other bird-habitat relationships were apparent, but these patterns differed for populations of the same species at different sites. Consideration of habitat differences between areas within occupied territories versus unoccupied areas within plots revealed still other patterns of habitat occupancy. Some of these were consistent with those obtained in analyses at other scales, but many were not. How one characterizes the habitat occupancy of a species is thus dependent on the spatial scale used. We explore several factors that complicate bird-habitat analyses at different spatial scales, and conclude that these problems of scale are most likely to be circumvented by conducting studies at several hierarchically nested scales arranged on clearly defined environmental gradients over a reasonably long period of time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Cited by
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
The role of spatial scale and the perception of large‐scale species‐richness patterns
Rahbek, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00701.x · Cited by 1,435
Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects
McGarigal, K., & Cushman, S. A. (2002) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0335:ceoeat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 731
Interspecific Abundance-Range Size Relationships: An Appraisal of Mechanisms
Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., & Lawton, J. H. (1997) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5951 · Cited by 621
Habitat Selection Studies in Avian Ecology: A Critical Review
Jones, J. J. (2001) · The Auk · doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0557:hssiae]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 592
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiens, J. A., Rotenberry, J. T., & Horne, B. V.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 132
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329003326
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Habitat Occupancy Patterns of North American Shrubsteppe Birds: The Effects of Spatial Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3565849
- The paper
- Wiens, J. A., Rotenberry, J. T., & Horne, B. V. (1987). Habitat Occupancy Patterns of North American Shrubsteppe Birds: The Effects of Spatial Scale. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.