Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extinction in Nature Reserves: The Effect of Fragmentation and the Importance of Migration between Reserve Fragments

Burkey, Tormod Vaaland·1989·Oikos

Abstract

Simulation time is crucial to how the risk of extinction changes with fragmentation. For short to moderate time spans the probability of extinction increases exponentially with the degree of fragmentation. When the time span considered is long enough relative to the size of the reserve, the relationship is sigmoidal. With increasing time span or decreasing reserve size the curve gets steeper. Eventually only the sheer incline and ensuing plateau of a truncated sigmoidal curve remains. Consistently, a species is more likely to survive in a continuous tract of natural habitat than in one that is subdivided into isolated parcels. Migration can greatly reduce the extinction probability of species in fragmented reserves. The persistent disagreement in the SLOSS debate is discussed, and an attempt is made to explain why conflicting recommendations have emerged.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3565875

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Burkey, T. V.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1989-05
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
75
ISSN
0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316863032
Cited by
278
References
0
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extinction in Nature Reserves: The Effect of Fragmentation and the Importance of Migration between Reserve Fragments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3565875
The paper
Burkey, T. V. (1989). Extinction in Nature Reserves: The Effect of Fragmentation and the Importance of Migration between Reserve Fragments. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565875

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.