Cited by 116Evolution and Paleontology StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPlant and animal studies

Ungulate Frugivores and the Browser-Grazer Continuum

Bodmer, Richard E.·1990·Oikos

Abstract

Feeding strategies of ungulates are usually classified along a browser grazer continuum which ranges from browsing through to grazing ungulates, but does not accurately include frugivores. However, to understand the evolution of ungulate feeding it is necessary to have a classification that realistically incorporates the full range of ungulate feeding strategies. Such a classification can be described as a linear continuum that ranges from fruit feeders through to browsers and then grazers. Purely frugivorous ungulates are restricted to tropical forests and have consistently small body sizes. Pure grazers on the other hand are absent from tropical forests and are found most commonly in grassland and savannas. Browsing is the most common ungulate feeding strategy and is found in ungulates with a wide range of body sizes and is common in all habitat types. Fruit differs greatly from browses and grasses and adds additional support to the proposed frugivore-browser-grazer classification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3565960

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bodmer, R. E.
Corresponding author
Bodmer, Richard E.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1990-04
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
319
ISSN
0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019211813
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oikos (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
Keywords
frugivory, browsing, grazing, body size, tropical forests, diet classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review