Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms

Lyman, John T.·1985·Radiation Research

Abstract

Optimization of a treatment plan for radiation therapy will produce a plan with the highest probability for tumor control without exceeding an acceptable complication rate. To achieve this goal it is necessary to have a means to estimate probabilities of local control and normal tissue complication. In general, good treatment plans deliver a high uniform dose to the target volume and lower doses to the surrounding normal tissues. The tolerance dose values available for various normal tissues are usually assumed to apply to partial or full volumes of the tissue which have been uniformly irradiated. These values are the best guidelines for estimating complication probabilities in tissues that receive a uniform dose to a fraction of the tissue and no dose to the remainder. Dose-volume histograms are one means of evaluating the uniformity of the irradiation on the tissues. Frequently the normal tissues are not uniformly irradiated as is demonstrated by dose-volume histograms for different treatment plans. A recursive algorithm which uses these tolerance dose data has been written and can be applied to arbitrary dose-volume histograms to estimate the complication probability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3576626

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,160

Metadata

Authors
Lyman, J. T.
Venue
Radiation Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1985-11
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
S13
ISSN
0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004006404
Cited by
1,160
References
0
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3576626
The paper
Lyman, J. T. (1985). Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3576626

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.