Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Radiation Chemical Mechanisms of Single- and Double-Strand Break Formation in Irradiated SV40 DNA

Krisch, Robert E., Flick, Maryann B., Trumbore, Conrad N.·1991·Radiation Research

Abstract

Using an electrophoresis assay system developed in our laboratory, we have simultaneously measured single- and double-strand DNA breaks (SSBs and DSBs) induced by gamma radiation in small SV40 viral DNA molecules, under conditions of greatly varying radical scavenger concentration and DNA configuration. In our experiments with aqueous solutions of SV40 DNA, we observe that SSB induction is linear with dose (one-hit response), over the entire hydroxyl scavenger efficiency range examined, from approximately 0 to 5 x 10(9) s-1, while DSB induction shifts from having a major quadratic component (two-hit response) at very low scavenger efficiencies to nearly pure linear for efficiencies greater than 10(7) s-1. The mean ratio of SSBs to one-hit DSBs remains relatively constant with increasing scavenger efficiency, decreasing from about 100:1 to 40:1 as the scavenger efficiency increases from 2 x 10(5) s-1 to 5 x 10(9) s-1, and the absolute induction efficiencies for breaks decrease by three orders of magnitude. This decrease takes place primarily at scavenger efficiencies above 1 x 10(8) s-1. Irradiation of intranuclear SV40 minichromosomes induces SSBs and DSBs at nearly the same efficiencies as does irradiation of free DNA at the highest scavenger concentrations examined, and at only about twice the efficiencies observed at -75 degrees C, where direct effects are believed to predominate. Our observations that the linear-quadratic mix of the dose-response curve for DSBs depends critically on scavenger efficiency may help to clarify the considerable confusion in the literature on the shape of such curves. Our observations of a relatively constant ratio between one-hit SSBs and DSBs at low and moderate scavenger efficiencies are in agreement with the recent hypothesis of Siddiqi and Bothe (Radiat. Res. 112, 449-463 (1987)) that, contrary to widely and long-held beliefs, the formation by indirect effects of a one-hit DSB in DNA occurs under these conditions predominantly by a mechanism involving a single OH radical, with a presumed radical transfer between complementary DNA strands. In contrast, our results for strongly protective conditions are not consistent with this hypothesis, but are consistent with the predictions of Ward's hypothesis (Radiat. Res. 86, 185-195, (1981)) that one-hit DSBs from indirect effects are produced predominantly by local clusters of OH radicals from single energy deposition events (locally multiply damaged sites) rather than by single OH radicals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3577826

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Krisch, R. E., Flick, M. B., & Trumbore, C. N.
Venue
Radiation Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1991-05
Volume
126
Issue
2
Pages
251
ISSN
0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999666772
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
14.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation Chemical Mechanisms of Single- and Double-Strand Break Formation in Irradiated SV40 DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3577826
The paper
Krisch, R. E., Flick, M. B., & Trumbore, C. N. (1991). Radiation Chemical Mechanisms of Single- and Double-Strand Break Formation in Irradiated SV40 DNA. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3577826

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.