Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Self-Efficacy and Writing: A Different View of Self-Evaluation

Patricia R. McCarthy, Scott T. Meier, Regina Rinderer·1985·College Composition and Communication

Abstract

Both in our teaching and in our research, self-evaluation is coming to be recognized as an important facet of the writing process. Donald Murray first opened our eyes to the importance of self-evaluation when he described how he conducts a writing conference. One of the first questions he asks when a writer turns in a piece is How do you feel about it? He then goes on to ask a series of questions that encourage the writer to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the work. In a recent CCC article, How Writers Evaluate Their Own Writing (CCC, May, 1982), Susan Miller similarly stresses that self-evaluation is an essential step in effective writing processes. Several other composition researchers including Beach, Perl, Pianko, Flower and Hayes, and Sommers have demonstrated that assessment of one's written work can influence

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.2307/357865

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
McCarthy, P. R., Meier, S. T., & Rinderer, R.
Venue
College Composition and Communication
Publisher
National Council of Teachers of English
Published
1985-12-01
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
465-465
ISSN
0010-096X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W142798838
Cited by
191
References
0
FWCI
16.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-Efficacy and Writing: A Different View of Self-Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/357865
The paper
McCarthy, P. R., Meier, S. T., & Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-Efficacy and Writing: A Different View of Self-Evaluation. College Composition and Communication. https://doi.org/10.2307/357865

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.