Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Field Experiments on the Drifting, Colonization and Continuous Redistribution of Stream Benthos

Townsend, Colin R., Hildrew, Alan G.·1976·The Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Invertebrate drift is a phenomenon of prime importance to the benthic community of streams (see review papers by Elliott 1967; Hynes 1970a, b; Muller 1966, 1974; Ulfstrand 1968; Waters 1969, 1972). The downstream movement in stream currents of large numbers of invertebrates profoundly influences benthic community dynamics in two ways. Firstly, the continuous loss of animals into the water column reduces benthic density, and since some species and size classes are more prone to drift than others, the composition of the local community is affected. Secondly, the continuous settling out of animals from the drift plays an important colonizing role. Thus, the twin influences of drift contribute to a continuous redistribution of benthos. The extent and rate of these two dynamic processes are among the most basic of ecological parameters in the stream ecosystem, and yet very little study has been specifically directed to their measurement. The phenomenon of drift is one which lends itself to experimentation in the field, and it is surprising that so little has been made of this opportunity. Studies involving field experiments have, however, been carried out into the question of the distance of drift (Waters 1965; McLay 1970; Elliott 1971a), the relationship between drift and density of the benthos (Waters 1965; Dimond 1967), the influence of light on drift rates (e.g. Elliott 1965a; Holt & Waters 1967), and the influence of temperature on drift rates (Wojtalik & Waters 1970). In the present study, we distinguish between movements of invertebrates brought about by crawling over the substrate, as opposed to drifting, and evaluate the role that drift plays in the colonization of new areas of stream bed exposed both experimentally and naturally. Colonization of unpopulated areas of stream bed, whether exposed by erosion, excavation of new channels, or denuded by pollution, has often been reported to be initiated by the drifting of invertebrates from upstream (Moffett 1936; Surber 1937; Laurie & Ericksen Jones 1938; Leonard 1942; Muller 1954; Patrick 1959; Chutter 1968; Crisp & Gledhill 1970). Colonization of experimentally exposed substrates has been studied by Moon (1940), who never mentioned drift, and more quantitatively by Waters (1964), Cairns & Ruthven (1970), Dickson & Cairns (1972), Glime & Clemons (1972), Nilsen & Larimore (1973) and Ulfstrand, Nilsson & Stergar (1974). However, none of these workers specifically attempted to measure the role of drift in colonization as opposed to movements across the substrate. We also performed concurrent experiments on the spatial and temporal variability of drift in the stream, and estimated the rate and extent of drift mediated losses and gains by all the principal taxa of the benthic community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3579

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Townsend, C. R., & Hildrew, A. G.
Venue
The Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1976-10
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
759
ISSN
0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331375104
Cited by
324
References
0
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field Experiments on the Drifting, Colonization and Continuous Redistribution of Stream Benthos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3579
The paper
Townsend, C. R., & Hildrew, A. G. (1976). Field Experiments on the Drifting, Colonization and Continuous Redistribution of Stream Benthos. The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/3579

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.