Integrating Grammar Instruction and Communicative Language Use through Grammar Consciousness-Raising Tasks
Abstract
Grammar consciousness-raising tasks combine the development of knowledge about problematic L2 grammatical features with the provision for meaning-focused use of the target language. However, for this task type to be pedagogically useful in ESL/EFL classrooms, it must be shown that task performance is as effective as a teacher-fronted grammar lesson in promoting gains in knowledge of the target structure and is comparable to performance of regular communicative tasks in terms of opportunities for communicative language exchange. This article reports an investigation of three grammar consciousness-raising tasks dealing with word order. The results indicate that the tasks successfully promoted both proficiency gains and L2 negotiated interaction in the participants, with negotiation quantity being determined by the combination of task features present rather than by the nature of the task content. Thus, grammar consciousness-raising tasks can be recommended as one way to integrate formal instruction within a communicative framework.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Explicit exposure to morphological forms positively affects the acquisition of the target language and causes better language gains.
“Explicit exposure to morphological forms positively affects the acquisition of the target language and, in turn, causes better language gains (Khan, 2022;Fotos, 1994;Swain, 1998).”
From Transformative impacts of explicit morphological instruction on irregular inflectional acquisition in Saudi EFL learners (2024) · cites this paper as Fotos, 1994
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 329
- Authors
- Fotos, S. S.
- Corresponding author
- Fotos, Sandra S.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166071367
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 43.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- grammar instruction, communicative language teaching, word order, second language grammar, negotiated interaction, task-based language learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review