The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Qualitative Theory and Methods in Applied Linguistics Research
Abstract
This article reviews basic issues of theory and method in qualitative research approaches to applied linguistics research. As pointed out by Lazaraton (this issue), a great deal of debate, misunderstanding, and confusion currently surrounds the use of qualitative research methods in the applied linguistics field. Much of this controversy appears to center around three interrelated issues: research traditions, definitions of research, and qualitative research theory and methods. In this article I examine these issues with a view toward dispelling some of the confusion and illuminating the ways in which qualitative research can contribute to our understanding of language acquisition and use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Cited by
Understanding the "Other Side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange
O'Dowd, R. (2003) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25202 · Cited by 403
Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and a multilingual pedagogical approach
Haukås, Å. (2016) · International Journal of Multilingualism · doi:10.1080/14790718.2015.1041960 · Cited by 395
Mixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x · Cited by 183
Qualitative Research in Language Teaching and Learning Journals, 1997–2006
BENSON, P., CHIK, A., GAO, X., HUANG, J., & WANG, W. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00829.x · Cited by 92
Lazaraton, A. (2003) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00175 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, K. A.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148757405
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
