The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Postmethod Pedagogy
Abstract
As a consequence of repeatedly articulated dissatisfaction with the limitations of the concept of method and the transmission model of teacher education, the L2 profession is faced with an imperative need to construct a postmethod pedagogy. In this article, I conceptualize the parameters of a postmethod pedagogy, offer suggestions for implementing it, and then raise questions and concerns that might come up in implementing it. Visualizing a three-dimensional system consisting of the parameters of particularity, practicality, and possibility, I argue that a postmethod pedagogy must (a) facilitate the advancement of a context-sensitive language education based on a true understanding of local linguistic, sociocultural, and political particularities; (b) rupture the reified role relationship between theorists and practitioners by enabling teachers to construct their own theory of practice; and (c) tap the sociopolitical consciousness that participants bring with them in order to aid their quest for identity formation and social transformation. Treating learners, teachers, and teacher educators as coexplorers, I discuss their roles and functions in a postmethod pedagogy. I conclude by raising the prospect of replacing the limited concept of method with the three pedagogic parameters of particularity, practicality, and possibility as organizing principles for L2 teaching and teacher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical
Van Manen, M. (1977) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1080/03626784.1977.11075533 · Cited by 1,623
Cited by
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v3n4p237 · Cited by 458
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
Challenges in Teaching English to Young Learners: Global Perspectives and Local Realities
Copland, F., Garton, S., & Burns, A. (2014) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.148 · Cited by 300
Professional development of secondary school EFL teachers: Voices from Indonesia
Cirocki, A., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.102111 · Cited by 117
Teacher Reflection and its Relation to Teacher Efficacy and Autonomy
Noormohammadi, S. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.556 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumaravadivelu, B.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 537
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990417079
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.