The Relevance of Wind for Optimal Migration Theory
Abstract
Tracking radar measurements of winds at the flight levels of bird migration during several migratory seasons in central Europe, southern Israel and the western Mediterranean are analysed with regard to optimal migratory behaviour in relation to wind. Birds migrating through central Europe and the Mediterranean area have to cope with windspeeds commonly ranging from 50 to 100% of their normal airspeed. Opposing winds prevail in central Europe, while at the western and eastern edge of the Mediterranean headand tailwinds occur in similar frequencies. Winds are highly variable in time and altitude. A bird migrating selectively during nights with favourable wind conditions speeds up its flight by 30% (on average) compared to an individual disregarding the wind situation. Selecting the most profitable flight altitude may result in an additional gain of 40% in flight speed. Therefore, taking into account the wind situation carefully, a bird can almost double its flight speed and save about half of the energy required for its migratory journey through central Europe and the Mediterranean. The time needed for refuelling decreases accordingly or the safety margins provided by fat reserves can be increased. For birds flying long distances in one step, the selection of favourable winds should be more important than adjusting departure to local fat accumulation rates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Theoretical analysis predicts that by accounting for wind conditions, birds could double their ground speed and accordingly save as much as half of the energy required for migratory flights.
“Theoretical analysis also predicts that by accounting for wind conditions, birds could double their ground speed and accordingly save as much as half of the energy required for migratory flights (Liechti and Bruderer, 1998).”
From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Liechti and Bruderer, 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wind selectivity of migratory flight departures in birds
Åkesson, S., & Hedenström, A. (2000) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s002650050004 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Schaub, M., Liechti, F., & Jenni, L. (2004) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.03.011 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationThe physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude
Altshuler, D. L. (2006) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icj008 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liechti, F., & Bruderer, B.
- ORCID
- Bruderer, Bruno
- Venue
- Journal of Avian Biology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 561
- ISSN
- 0908-8857 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2313816794
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Avian Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
- Keywords
- bird migration, wind, flight speed, energy conservation, refueling, fat reserves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review