Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,089

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology

Lyons, J., Steinberg, Danny D., Jakobovits, Leon A.·1973·The Modern Language Review

Abstract

Preface Acknowledgements and references to reprinted articles Part I. Philosophy: Overview Charles E. Caton Section 1. Meaning: 1. On sentence-sense, word-sense and difference of word sense. Towards a philosophical theory of dictionaries David Wiggins 2. How does one tell whether a word has one, several or many senses? William P. Alston 3 A reply to Mr Alson David Wiggins 4. Meaning H. G. Price 5. Three levels of meaning Gilbert H. Harman Section 2. Reference: 1. Reference and referents Leonard Linsky 2. Identifying reference and truth-values P. F. Strawson 3. Reference and definite descriptions Keith Donnellan 4. Singular terms Zeno Vaendler 5. The problem of proper names John R. Searle 6. The inscrutability of reference W. V. Quine Part II. Linguistics: Overview Howard Maclay Section 1. The Role of Semantics in a Grammar: 1. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretations Noam Chomsky 2. Where do noun phrases come from? James D. McCawley 3. On generative semantics George Lakoff Section 2. Meaning, Presupposition and Reference: 1. Semantic theory Jerrold J. Katz 2. Explorations in semantic theory Uriel Weinreich 3. Presupposition and relative well-formedness George Lakoff 4. Presupposition and assertion in the semantic analysis of nouns and verbs in English D. Terence Langendoen 5. Fact Paul Kiparsky and Carol Kiparsky Section 3. The Lexicon: 1. Types of lexical information Charles J. Fillmore 2. The data of semantic description Edward H. Bendix 3. On classifying semantic features Manfred Bierwisch 4. A method of semantic description R. M. W. Dixon 5. A note on a Walbiri tradition of antonymy Kenneth Hale Part III. Psychology: Overview Danny Steinberg Section 1. Theoretical Issues: 1. Where do sentences come from? Charles E. Osgood 2. Are there specifically linguistic universals? David McNeill 3. Language and cognition Eric H. Lenneberg 4. Could meaning be an rm? Jerry A. Fodor Section 2. Empirical Studies: 1. Empirical methods in the study of semantics George A. Miller 2. Some lexical structures and their empirical validity Thomas G. Bever and Peter S. Rosenbaum Index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3724998

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,089

Metadata

Authors
Lyons, J., Steinberg, D. D., & Jakobovits, L. A.
Venue
The Modern Language Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1973-07
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
619
ISSN
0026-7937 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995759672
Cited by
1,089
References
0
FWCI
322.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3724998
The paper
Lyons, J., Steinberg, D. D., & Jakobovits, L. A. (1973). Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. The Modern Language Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/3724998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.