Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 40Marriage and Family DynamicsGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsCross-Cultural and Social Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward a Theory of Marriage: The Economic Anthropology of Marriage Transactions

Open access
Bossen, Laurel·1988·Ethnology

Abstract

The economic arrangements that surround marriage are an area of enduring interest for economic anthropologists and one of re-examination for women's studies. The formation of new households and family ties based on a sexual division of labor and on long-term investment in a new generation of laborers involves major economic shifts for individual women and men, and for society as a whole. In many societies, marriage entails rather explicit group negotiations regarding personnel and property. Economic anthropologists attempt to identify the costs and benefits to the parties involved, and to explain the occurrence of different types of transfers and exchanges between families and kin groups. However, the interested parties have rarely been analyzed in terms of gender differences. Most of the literature on marriage negotiations and transactions takes a social or androcentric perspective in which marriageable women are portrayed as passive objects rather than active participants whose livelihoods are at stake. In this discussion, I analyze some of the literature on women in marriage transactions in order to re-evaluate the theoretical approaches that economic anthropologists bring to the cross-cultural study of marriage. One difficulty in analyzing and generalizing about marriage transactions is the variability of marriage practices themselves. Another is the fact that in many societies, marriage is not defined by a single event, ceremony, or onetime economic transaction. It may be established slowly, by increments, with varying rights and complex obligations, and it may be established without any formal transfers of property. The economic implications of marriage arrangements over the lifecycle are more difficult to study than transactions that occur at some moment. For this reason, there has been a tendency to telescope the process of marriage, and oversimplify the complexities of gender and generational economics in the reproductive systems of other cultures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3773624

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Bossen, L.
Corresponding author
Bossen, Laurel
Venue
Ethnology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988-04
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
127
ISSN
0014-1828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W210130821
Cited by
40
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Ethnology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
Keywords
marriage, gender differences, women's economic status, household formation, property transfer, kinship, gender division of labor, reproductive system, cross-cultural comparison, marriage negotiations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review