Population Changes within the Gallatin Elk Herd, 1932-65
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
From a high of 1700-2500 elk in the 1930s, the upper Gallatin elk population declined to 800-1300 by the late 1990s because of deteriorating winter forage, severe winters, and hunting.
“From a high of 1700 -2500 elk (8 -12 elk km -2 ) in the 1930s, elk populations declined to a low of 800-1300 elk (4 -6 elk km -2 ) by the late 1990s because of (1) a deterioration of foraging conditions in the winter range (due to high rates of herbivory) in combination with the periodic occurrence of severe winters, during which significant numbers of elk starved, and (2) annual harvest by Hunt”
From River channel dynamics following extirpation of wolves in northwestern Yellowstone National Park, USA (2006) · cites this paper as Peek et al., 1967
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Winnie, J., & Creel, S. (2007) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.007 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Wolves, elk, willows, and trophic cascades in the upper Gallatin Range of Southwestern Montana, USA
Ripple, W. J., & Beschta, R. L. (2004) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.017 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
REDUCED COTTONWOOD RECRUITMENT FOLLOWING EXTIRPATION OF WOLVES IN YELLOWSTONE'S NORTHERN RANGE
Beschta, R. L. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-0964 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2006) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1362 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Christianson, D., & Creel, S. (2008) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arn079 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Recovering Riparian Plant Communities with Wolves in Northern Yellowstone, U.S.A.
Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2008) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00450.x · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Christianson, D., & Creel, S. (2014) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102330 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“for both female and male groups [30] and relatively small antlers.”
Background
- Authors
- Peek, J. M., Lovaas, A. L., & Rouse, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1967-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 304
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314855730
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- elk, Gallatin National Forest, population dynamics, elk management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
