The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stem Breakage by Moose
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moose may break aspen saplings to access browse in winter (Telfer & Cairns, 1978)”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Telfer & Cairns, 1978
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bork, E. W., Hudson, R. J., & Bailey, A. W. (1997) · Plant Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1009718908103 · Cited by 25
Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings
Painter, L. E., Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2023) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10369 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Telfer, E. S., & Cairns, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1978-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 639
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321295942
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- moose, stem breakage, tree damage, forest damage, wildlife damage to trees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
