The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Some Statistical Techniques for Analysis of Resource Selection
Abstract
Many biologists and statisticians still have questions about analysis of resource selection data. Consequently, we compared 4 statistical methods for analysis of habitat selection by considering hypotheses, assumptions, and methods of calculation. We used detailed calculations on gray partridge (Perdix perdix) habitat-use data to note factors that may cause the methods to give disparate results. The factors we identified where the emphasis or relative weight placed on within- versus between-animal observations, independence and variability assumptions, and the relationship between the statistical hypothesis and the biological hypothesis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Nonparametric Statistics
Groggel, D. J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486067 · Cited by 11,041
An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis
Muirhead, R. J., & Anderson, T. W. (1986) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.2307/1391399 · Cited by 9,082
Barr, A. J. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,198
The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005
Simultaneous Statistical Inference
Miller, R. G. (1981) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8122-8 · Cited by 5,604
Multivariate Statistical Methods
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Public Health · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_2263 · Cited by 5,580
Introduction to Statistical Analysis.
Latshaw, V. V., Dixon, W. J., & Massey, F. J. (1957) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2309989 · Cited by 5,072
The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference
Johnson, D. H. (1980) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937156 · Cited by 4,388
Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed).
Groeneveld, R. A., & Conover, W. J. (1981) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287607 · Cited by 1,849
Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes
Farris, D. A., Ivlev, V. S., & Scott, D. (1962) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1439522 · Cited by 1,751
Cited by
Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio‐Tracking Data
Aebischer, N. J., Robertson, P. A., & Kenward, R. E. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940062 · Cited by 1,909
Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or presence–absence
Jiménez-Valverde, A., & Lobo, J. M. (2007) · Acta Oecologica · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2007.02.001 · Cited by 892
Habitat Selection Studies in Avian Ecology: A Critical Review
Jones, J. J. (2001) · The Auk · doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0557:hssiae]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 592
Habitat Use and Ecological Correlates of Home Range Size in a Small Cervid: The Roe Deer
Tufto, J., Andersen, R., & Linnell, J. (1996) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5670 · Cited by 431
D'EON, R. G., & DELPARTE, D. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01010.x · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Alldredge, J. R., & Ratti, J. T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330373318
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Some Statistical Techniques for Analysis of Resource Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3801507
- The paper
- Alldredge, J. R., & Ratti, J. T. (1986). Comparison of Some Statistical Techniques for Analysis of Resource Selection. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
