Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Woodland Caribou Relative to Landscape Patterns in Northeastern Alberta

Stuart-Smith, A. Kari, Bradshaw, Corey J. A., Boutin, Stan, Hebert, Daryll M., Rippin, A. Blair·1997·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

From 1991 through 1994, 65 adult woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) were radiocollared and monitored across 20,000 km 2 of northeastem Alberta. Adult survival averaged 0.88 ± 0.03, and did not differ among years. Calf survival was 18 calves/100 cows in March of both years it was measured, with calves composing a mean of 9.0% of the March populations. Highest calf mortality occurred during the first month of life. The population rate-of-increase, r, was -0.08 (A = 0.92), suggesting the population was declining. Caribou locations were restricted to peatlands, with 98.7% of locations falling within the 5 fen complexes in the study area. There was little permanent movement (5% of individuals over 4 yr) among fen complexes. Multi-year home ranges (100% minimum convex polygon; MCP) averaged 711 km 2 , with the size of individual home ranges (HR) correlated with the area of fen complexes. Summer HRs were smaller than winter HRs, and smaller for females than males in summer, but not winter. Locations were further from fen/upland boundaries in winter than in summer, and further from fen/upland boundaries than random points within fens in both seasons. Movement rates were highest in winter and lowest in summer, and did not differ between sexes. There was a negative correlation between movement rate and snow depth at month-end. Monthly trends in group size paralleled those in movement rates, while group composition was relatively stable throughout most of the year. Trends in group size, movement, and spatial distribution suggest caribou increased spacing among themselves during summer, and were more concentrated during winter. The study area consisted of 2 different landscapes, varying in the amount and configuration of fen patches. When we compared caribou biology between the 2 areas, we found lower calf survival and smaller home ranges in the landscape with smaller fen patches and a higher proportion of upland.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3802170

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Stuart-Smith, A. K., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Boutin, S., Hebert, D. M., & Rippin, A. B.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1997-07
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
622
ISSN
0022-541X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2317121017
Cited by
188
References
0
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Woodland Caribou Relative to Landscape Patterns in Northeastern Alberta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3802170
The paper
Stuart-Smith, A. K., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Boutin, S., Hebert, D. M., & Rippin, A. B. (1997). Woodland Caribou Relative to Landscape Patterns in Northeastern Alberta. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802170

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.