Development of Predictive Models of Nutritional Condition for Rocky Mountain Elk
Abstract
Rachel C. Cook, John G. Cook, Dennis L. Murray, Peter Zager, Bruce K. Johnson, Michael W. Gratson, Development of Predictive Models of Nutritional Condition for Rocky Mountain Elk, The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 65, No. 4 (Oct., 2001), pp. 973-987
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is unlikely to be optimal for elk to simply avoid these resources because many provide forage during critical winter months when elk experience diminishing fat reserves.
“However, we think it is unlikely to be optimal for elk to simply avoid these resources, because many of them provide forage during the critical winter months (Creel et al. 2005;Mao et al. 2005) when NR elk (and other northern ungulates) experience diminishing fat reserves (Cook et al. 2001).”
From Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system (2007) · cites this paper as Cook et al. 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system
Kauffman, M. J., Varley, N., Smith, D. W., Stahler, D. R., MacNulty, D. R., & Boyce, M. S. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01059.x · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Influence of harvest, climate and wolf predation on Yellowstone elk, 1961-2004
Vucetich, J. A., Smith, D. W., & Stahler, D. R. (2005) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.14180.x · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Morfeld, K. A., Meehan, C. L., Hogan, J. N., & Brown, J. L. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155146 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cook, R. C., Cook, J. G., Murray, D. L., Zager, P., Johnson, B. K., & Gratson, M. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 973
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318859213
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Idaho Department of Fish and Game
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- Rocky Mountain elk, nutritional status, body condition index, prediction model, body condition assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
