The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoiding Pitfalls When Using Information-Theoretic Methods
Abstract
We offer suggestions to avoid misuse of information-theoretic methods in wildlife laboratory and field studies. Our suggestions relate to basic science issues and the need to ask deeper questions (4 problems are noted), errors in the way that analytical methods are used (7 problems), and outright mistakes seen commonly in the published literature (5 problems). We assume that readers are familiar with the information-theoretic approaches and provide several examples of misuse. Any method can be misused-our purpose here is to suggest constructive ways to avoid misuse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Self-citationGelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss—Newton method
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.439 · Cited by 2,122
Cited by
Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124104268644 · Cited by 11,648
Self-citationUninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion
ARNOLD, T. W. (2010) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01236.x · Cited by 3,417
Vrieze, S. I. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0027127 · Cited by 1,948
Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC
Aho, K., Derryberry, D., & Peterson, T. (2014) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/13-1452.1 · Cited by 1,165
HABITAT SELECTION BY ELK BEFORE AND AFTER WOLF REINTRODUCTION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK
MAO, J. S., BOYCE, M. S., SMITH, D. W., SINGER, F. J., VALES, D. J., VORE, J. M., & MERRILL, E. H. (2005) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1691:hsbeba]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, D. R., & Burnham, K. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 912
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2332269753
- Cited by
- 1,324
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avoiding Pitfalls When Using Information-Theoretic Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3803155
- The paper
- Anderson, D. R., & Burnham, K. P. (2002). Avoiding Pitfalls When Using Information-Theoretic Methods. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3803155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
