Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tribes, Traditions and Numbers: The American Model in Southern African Iron Age Ceramic Studies

Hall, Martin·1983·The South African Archaeological Bulletin

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3888636

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In southern African Iron Age studies, pottery is generally examined to establish group identities and relative chronologies, as if it was not active in everyday life.

    “where pottery is generally examined to establish groups identities and their relative chronologies as if it was not active in everyday life”
  • This omission of metric attributes is prevalent in African archaeology.

    “This omission is prevalent in African archaeology (see Hall, 1983; Gosselain, 1992; Ndoro, 1996; Ogundele, 2006; Pikirayi, 2007; Ashley, 2010; Mtetwa et al., 2013; Nyamushosho, 2017).”
  • The implications of this study appeal to wider debates in archaeology and (ceramic) ethnoarchaeology that call for a transformation in knowledge production.

    “When viewed using a global lens, the implications of this study appeal to wider debates in archaeology, and (ceramic) ethnoarchaeology that calls for a transformation in knowledge production (i.e. Hall, 1983; Dietler and Herbich, 1989; Stahl, 1995; Ndoro, 1996; Stark, 2003; Karega-Munene and Schmidt, 2010; Lane, 2011; Pikirayi, 2015; Chirikure, 2016, Chirikure, 2020; Cunningham and MacEachern, 201”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hall, M.
Venue
The South African Archaeological Bulletin
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1983-12
Volume
38
Issue
138
Pages
51
ISSN
0038-1969
Cited by
23
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review