The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbohydrate Reserves of Grasses: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Carbohydrate reserves are nonstructural carbohydrates. Sucrose and fructosan are the predominant reserve constituents of temperate-origin grasses; sucrose and starch, of tropical-origin grasses. Nitrogenous compounds are used in respiration, but probably are not alternately stored and utilized as are carbohydrate reserves. Most carbohydrate reserves are stored in the lower regions of the stems-stem bases, stolons, corms, and rhizomes. Nonstructural carbohydrates in the roots of grasses are probably not used directly in herbage regrowth following herbage removal. Plant development stage, temperature, water stress, and nitrogen fertilization can drastically change the reserve level. The seasonal variation of carbohydrate reserves is often different for the same species when grown in different environments. The level of carbohydrate reserves in the lower regions of the stems apparently affects the regrowth rate for the first 2 to 7 days following herbage removal. Following the initial period, plant regrowth rate depends on other factors, such as leaf area and nutrient uptake. This initial effect from the level of carbohydrate reserves can be maintained during subsequent exponential growth. Grazing may be more detrimental than clipping if it removes herbage from some plants and not others. The ungrazed plants may take the available nutrients and water away from the grazed plants. However, grazing may be less detrimental than clipping if grazing leaves ungrazed tillers on a plant while removing others, thus allowing for the transfer of carbohydrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physiological Aspects of Crop Yield
(1969) · ASSA, CSSA and SSSA · doi:10.2135/1969.physiologicalaspects · Cited by 348
Responses of individual plants to harvesting
Jameson, D. A. (1963) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02860815 · Cited by 274
The Effect of Defoliation on the Carbon Balance in Dactylis glomerata
DAVIDSON, J. L., & MILTHORPE, F. L. (1966) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084066 · Cited by 210
Bowden, B. N. (1964) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/003072706400400410 · Cited by 160
Root-growth Stoppage Resulting from Defoliation of GrassPreprint
Crider, F. J., & Crider, F. J. (1955) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.156759 · Cited by 155
Cited by
Integrated Responses of Plants to Stress
Chapin (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311538 · Cited by 803
Diurnal variation in gas exchange and nonstructural carbohydrates throughout sugarcane development
De Souza, A. P., Grandis, A., Arenque-Musa, B. C., & Buckeridge, M. S. (2018) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp17268 · Cited by 49
Response of Switchgrass Yield and Quality to Harvest Season and Nitrogen Fertilizer
Sadeghpour, A., Gorlitsky, L. E., Hashemi, M., Weis, S. A., & Herbert, S. J. (2014) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0183 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- White, L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Range Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1973-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13
- ISSN
- 0022-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2516868390
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbohydrate Reserves of Grasses: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3896873
- The paper
- White, L. M. (1973). Carbohydrate Reserves of Grasses: A Review. Journal of Range Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3896873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.